Identify what PPE and glass-handling practices OSHA expects for a glazing crew handling large panes (cut/laceration hazard), since there is no glazing-specific OSHA standard.
domain: osha.gov · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Confirm there is no dedicated OSHA glazing/glass-handling standard; the applicable general industry/construction requirements are 29 CFR 1910.132 (general PPE hazard assessment) and 1910.138 (hand protection)
Under 1910.132, document a task-based hazard assessment identifying glass-edge cut/laceration exposure, load weight, and handling frequency before selecting PPE
Under 1910.138(b), select gloves based on the assessed hazard; OSHA does not mandate a specific cut-resistance rating by name, but ANSI/ISEA 105 is the referenced industry rating system to specify against — the current (2016/2020/2024) editions use a nine-tier A1-A9 scale (rising cut-resistance load), with glass and window handling commonly specified in the A6-A9 range; the older 'Level 1-5' scale is from the superseded 2005 edition and should not be cited as current
Reference OSHA's SIC Manual classification 1793 ('Glass and Glazing Work') only for statistical/industry classification purposes — it is not a safety standard and imposes no PPE requirements itself
Layer in mechanical-handling controls (vacuum lifters, suction cups, glass carts) as the preferred engineering control ahead of relying on PPE alone, consistent with OSHA's general hierarchy-of-controls guidance in publications like OSHA 3151
Known gotchas
Because no OSHA standard names glazing/glass-handling explicitly, compliance is assembled from general provisions (1910.132/1910.138) plus industry consensus practice — do not cite a nonexistent 'OSHA glazing standard' in a safety plan
SIC code 1793 is a classification/statistical code (also referenced in some state programs), not a safety regulation; confusing it with a compliance standard is a common documentation error
A glove marketed as 'Level 5' under the old 2005 ANSI/ISEA 105 scale is not directly equivalent to any single current A1-A9 rating; confirm which edition a supplier's cut-rating claim is tested against before treating it as meeting a current spec
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?