Advise a shop on how NDT written-practice documentation should be structured to support both SNT-TC-1A employer-based certification and eventual ISO 9712/ACCP recognition
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Confirm that under either scheme, a written practice is a mandatory internal document specifying minimum education, training hours, exams, and experience required for each NDT method and personnel level
For SNT-TC-1A, confirm the employer itself is responsible for certifying personnel against its own written practice — there is no external registry that substitutes for this
For ACCP/ISO 9712 alignment, confirm the written practice should document how externally-issued Level II/III certificates are evaluated and accepted (or not) by the shop's NDT Level III, since acceptance is a documented determination rather than automatic recognition
Confirm the written practice names training-hour and experience minimums per method (e.g., UT, RT, MT, PT) as adopted by the shop, since SNT-TC-1A is a recommended practice with tailorable minimums, not a fixed universal table
Recommend the shop have its NDT Level III review and sign the written practice periodically, and keep individual certification records (exam results, vision test currency, experience logs) as the actual verifiable evidence, since no public registry exists to check an individual SNT-TC-1A certification
Known gotchas
SNT-TC-1A is explicitly a 'recommended practice,' not a rigid standard — do not present specific training-hour numbers as if fixed by SNT-TC-1A itself; they are set in the employer's own written practice
A shop cannot simply 'add ISO 9712 later' by paperwork alone — ISO 9712 certification requires going through an accredited independent certification body's own exam process for the individual, not just an internal written-practice update
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?