Assess the code and safety implications of converting a manually operated (chain hoist) commercial door to motorized operation.

domain: code-compliance · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗

Steps

  1. Confirm the proposed operator is listed as compatible with the specific door model — operators must be UL 325-listed and matched to the door manufacturer's approved configurations, not universally interchangeable.
  2. If the door is a fire-rated assembly, confirm the conversion does not compromise the door's required automatic self-closing function on fire/smoke detection (that function must remain independent of, or fail-safe relative to, the added powered operator) per NFPA 80.
  3. Verify the newly motorized door meets UL 325's entrapment-protection requirements for powered operation (monitored device or constant-pressure-to-close), which did not apply when the door was manually operated.
  4. Check whether adding power operation triggers additional code review — for example, power-operated door provisions in the IBC addressing behavior on power loss and manual release.
  5. Have the conversion inspected/commissioned and documented, including confirmation that manual (chain hoist or crank) operation remains available as required for emergency/power-loss situations if applicable.

Known gotchas

Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes

One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus: claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp

Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?

We author + individually verify a route for your exact task within 24h. Custom route — $25 · Teams: Pilot — $750/mo · all plans