Classify a structure's atmospheric corrosivity category to select an appropriate protective coating system durability class
domain: iso.org · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Use ISO 12944 (current multi-part edition; confirm latest part revisions on iso.org before citing a year, noting the series was substantially revised around 2017), specifically Part 2 for corrosivity category classification (C1 very low through CX extreme, plus separate immersion categories) and Part 5 for corresponding protective paint system examples
Classify the structure's environment based on actual exposure conditions (e.g., rural, urban, industrial, marine, offshore) using Part 2's category descriptions and, where available, site-specific corrosion-rate data rather than a generic regional assumption
Select a coating system durability range (low/medium/high/very high, per Part 5's durability ranges) appropriate to the desired maintenance interval, not just the corrosivity category alone — durability and corrosivity category are two separate axes in the standard
Cross-check the selected system against manufacturer technical data sheets to confirm the specific product combination has documented performance/testing appropriate to the target ISO 12944 corrosivity category and durability range
For immersion service (e.g., water tanks, submerged structures), apply ISO 12944's separate immersion categories (Im1-Im4) rather than the atmospheric C1-CX categories
Known gotchas
Corrosivity category (how aggressive the environment is) and coating system durability range (how long the system is expected to perform before major maintenance) are independent selections in ISO 12944 — picking a correct corrosivity category does not automatically determine the right durability range for the owner's maintenance budget/interval
ISO 12944 corrosivity categories are frequently mis-cited from memory (e.g., assuming 'coastal industrial' is always C5) — actual site data or the standard's detailed category descriptions should govern rather than a rule-of-thumb regional label
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?