Decide between rekey and full replacement after a rental tenant turnover
domain: statutes.capitol.texas.gov · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Check whether the property's state has an explicit statutory rekey requirement at tenant turnover; for example, Texas Property Code requires certain security devices to be rekeyed within a set number of days of each tenant turnover, at the landlord's expense.
Where no statute mandates it, such as in several states with no explicit rekey-between-tenants law, advise the landlord that rekeying is still widely recommended best practice even though it isn't legally required.
Evaluate the hardware condition: if cylinders/locks are in good working order, a rekey is normally the faster, lower-cost option versus full hardware replacement.
Recommend full replacement instead of rekey when the hardware is worn, damaged, non-conforming to current code, or when the client wants to upgrade to a keyway or security tier the existing hardware can't support.
Document the work performed and, where applicable, the statutory deadline met, in case the landlord needs to show compliance later.
Known gotchas
Statutory rekey deadlines and obligations are state (and sometimes city) specific; don't assume a rule that applies in one state applies nationwide.
Rekeying only changes what key operates the existing cylinder; it doesn't address a lock that is undersized, damaged, or non-code-compliant, which should be flagged separately as a replacement issue.
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?