Decide between shop-applied and field-applied coating for a fabricated steel structure and write the spec split correctly

domain: ampp.org · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗

Steps

  1. Map the coating system's required surface prep, environmental control, and cure conditions against what can realistically be achieved in the shop vs. the field for the specific project (shop generally allows tighter environmental control per SSPC-PA 2/SSPC-SP standards; field is constrained by weather, access, and containment)
  2. If specifying a QP-accredited applicator, confirm the shop is QP 3 accredited and the field crew is separately QP 1 (or QP 9 for architectural-scope work) accredited, since these are distinct AMPP accreditations and one does not imply the other
  3. Define the shop/field coating split explicitly by coat (e.g., shop primer + shop intermediate, field topcoat only) rather than leaving 'shop or field' ambiguous, since touch-up and stripe-coating requirements at the interface differ by split
  4. Specify surface preparation and DFT requirements for touch-up of shop-applied coating damaged during transport/erection before field topcoat is applied
  5. Confirm compatibility (recoat window, generic type) between the shop-applied and field-applied products in writing from the coating manufacturer, since mismatched systems from different manufacturers are a common field failure mode

Known gotchas

Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes

One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus: claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp

Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?

We author + individually verify a route for your exact task within 24h. Custom route — $25 · Teams: Pilot — $750/mo · all plans