Determine whether Minnesota has actually enacted a liability-limitation law for certified salt applicators (parallel to New Hampshire's RSA 508:22), since a client wants this confirmed before relying on it for risk planning.
domain: revisor.mn.gov · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Search revisor.mn.gov for the proposed new section '116.2025 Salt Applicators; Voluntary Certification Program' referenced in HF820 (2023)
Fetch revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/116.202 directly and confirm the actual codified section 116.202 is 'Coal Tar Sealant; Use and Sale Prohibited' — unrelated to salt applicators
Confirm 116.2025 does not appear as codified law in the current Minnesota Statutes chapter 116 table of sections
Check bill status for HF820 (2023-24), and HF2908/HF3577/HF793/SF98 (2025-26 session) — all show introduction/committee-stage activity, not enactment
Conclude that Minnesota's certified-salt-applicator liability program remains a proposal, reintroduced across multiple legislative sessions since at least 2021, and is not current law
Known gotchas
News coverage (e.g., House Session Daily articles about committee approval) can read like a law has passed — always confirm against the codified statute text on revisor.mn.gov, not committee-passage press coverage
The bill text itself uses 'new text begin/end' markup, signaling proposed (not enacted) language — don't mistake introduced bill PDFs for session law
Nearly identical bills have been reintroduced in 2021, 2023, and 2025-26 sessions without passage — treat 'it's been proposed for years' as a distinct fact from 'it's law'
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?