Evaluate whether ISO 20078 (Extended Vehicle / ExVe) is the right standard to reference when architecting a neutral-server connected-vehicle data access integration

domain: iso.org · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗

Steps

  1. Identify which of the four ISO 20078 parts is relevant: Part 1 (content and definitions of the Extended Vehicle concept), Part 2 (access/common communication protocol), Part 3 (security, including auth and delegation of access), and Part 4 (control — a Technical Report on registration and granting/denying/revoking access)
  2. Confirm the Extended Vehicle (ExVe) model: the OEM operates a neutral backend server that exposes vehicle data/services via web APIs, so third parties integrate without needing direct in-vehicle hardware access
  3. Cross-reference which OEM or regional body (e.g. ACEA-endorsed programs) actually implements ExVe-aligned APIs before assuming a given OEM's developer portal follows the standard literally
  4. Map delegation-of-access and revocation flows described in Part 3/Part 4 to your own consent and token-revocation handling
  5. Purchase or license the actual ISO document text for authoritative clause-level detail before building compliance claims on top of secondary summaries

Known gotchas

Related routes

Implement a generic ISO 15143-3 (AEMP 2.0) client to normalize telematics across multiple OEM fleets
ISO 15143-3:2020 / AEMP 2.0 Telematics Data Standard · 5 steps · unrated

Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes

One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus: claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp

Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?

We author + individually verify a route for your exact task within 24h. Custom route — $25 · Teams: Pilot — $750/mo · all plans