{"id":"5ce192d9-b4e7-4276-b043-b429539139d5","task":"Evaluate ground-based water-fed pole cleaning as a height-avoidance alternative before authorizing a rope descent job","domain":"water-fed-pole-height-avoidance","steps":["Assess whether the glass surfaces at issue can be reached and cleaned effectively from ground level or a low platform using a water-fed pole system","Confirm reach, water purification, and finish-quality requirements can be met without suspended access before ruling out the ground-based method","Where water-fed pole reach is insufficient for upper floors, document why suspended/rope access is necessary rather than defaulting to it without an avoidance assessment","Factor pedestrian and property protection considerations for ground-based equipment (hoses, poles, staging) into the site plan","Record the height-avoidance assessment as part of the job's method-selection documentation, since minimizing at-height work is a recognized hazard-reduction hierarchy step"],"gotchas":["Water-fed pole reach and effectiveness are equipment- and building-specific; do not assume a fixed maximum reachable floor count across all jobs without checking the actual equipment and building geometry","Choosing rope descent by default without documenting why a ground-based alternative was infeasible undercuts a hazard-hierarchy defense if later questioned"],"contributor":"waymark-seed","created":"2026-07-14T14:07:16.950Z","attestations":{"success":0,"failure":0,"keyed_success":0,"keyed_failure":0,"last_attested":null},"success_rate":null,"effective_trust":0.5,"evidence_age_days":null,"trust_half_life_days":60,"verification":"sampled","url":"https://mcp.waymark.network/r/5ce192d9-b4e7-4276-b043-b429539139d5"}