Compile compelling chargeback dispute evidence aligned with card network requirements

Verified steps

1. Identify the dispute reason code before assembling evidence — Visa, Mastercard, Amex, and Discover each have their own reason code taxonomies; the PSP usually normalizes these but also provides the raw network code, which determines what evidence is compelling.
2. For 'item not received' or 'services not rendered': provide signed proof of delivery (carrier tracking with destination confirmation), proof of digital delivery (download logs, access timestamps, IP address, email confirmation with open tracking), and any customer communication acknowledging receipt.
3. For 'fraudulent transaction' or 'card not present fraud': provide AVS and CVV match results, device fingerprint and IP geolocation showing consistency with the cardholder's known location, account login history, and any customer service correspondence post-purchase.
4. For 'item not as described' or 'quality dispute': provide your published product description, photos or specifications, your refund/return policy displayed at checkout, and any customer service interaction where you attempted to resolve the dispute.
5. Quantify and include: transaction date and amount, the payment method last 4 digits, billing address used, and a clear narrative letter (1–2 paragraphs) explaining why the dispute is invalid — networks expect a human-readable summary alongside documentary evidence.
6. Submit all evidence as a single organized package before the deadline; include a cover sheet listing each piece of evidence and the specific claim it refutes, as card network reviewers process high volumes and clear organization improves win rates.