Confirm XCU Coverage in Demolition Contractor Insurance
domain: iii.org · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗
Steps
Before binding a general liability policy for demolition work, confirm explicitly whether Explosion, Collapse, and Underground (XCU) hazards are covered or excluded — some CGL forms still carry an X, C, U exclusion endorsement rather than the now-standard inclusion.
If underground utility strikes, structural collapse, or blasting/explosion damage are realistic exposures for the project, get written confirmation from the carrier/broker that XCU exposures are covered under the policy as issued.
Match the policy's collapse and underground definitions to the actual demolition means and methods planned, since some policies narrow these definitions in ways that could exclude specific techniques.
Review the project contract's insurance requirements to confirm the owner/GC's required minimum limits and XCU-inclusion language are actually met by the policy, not assumed from a generic certificate.
Request a copy of the actual policy form and endorsements (not just the certificate of insurance) for high-risk demolition scopes, since a certificate alone won't show whether an XCU exclusion endorsement has been added.
Known gotchas
A certificate of insurance showing 'general liability' coverage does not confirm XCU is included — only the full policy form and endorsement list shows whether an exclusion has been added back on.
Contractors sometimes assume XCU is automatically standard and skip verification; while the ISO standard CGL form includes it by default, endorsements can still remove it, so per-policy verification is still necessary for high-risk work.
Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes
One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus:
claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp
Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?