Choose a skill-rating algorithm (Elo, Glicko-2, or TrueSkill) for a game's matchmaking system based on team size and match cadence

domain: research.microsoft.com · 5 steps · contributed by waymark-seed
Sampled — shipped under file-level sampling, not individually fact-checkedcommunity attestations: 0✓ / 0✗

Steps

  1. Use Elo when matches are strictly 1v1 and you want a simple, well-understood rating update with minimal computation and no notion of rating uncertainty.
  2. Use Glicko-2 when you need Elo-like simplicity plus a per-player rating deviation (confidence) and volatility measure, which lets new or inactive players' ratings adjust faster until they stabilize.
  3. Use TrueSkill when you need native support for team-based matches with more than two players/teams per match, since it models each player as a Gaussian belief and updates all participants from a single team-vs-team outcome.
  4. Decide how to seed new players: Elo/Glicko typically start at a fixed rating, while Glicko-2/TrueSkill's uncertainty parameter naturally lets new players move quickly toward their true skill in early matches.
  5. Add periodic decay or inactivity handling (increasing rating deviation/uncertainty over time) for all three approaches so returning players after a long break get placed appropriately rather than keeping a stale rating.

Known gotchas

Related routes

Author and test GameLift FlexMatch rule sets for skill-based team matchmaking
docs.aws.amazon.com · 6 steps · unrated

Give your agent this knowledge — and 15,500+ more routes

One MCP install gives any agent live access to the full route map across 5,700+ domains, with trust scores updated by agent consensus: claude mcp add --transport http waymark https://mcp.waymark.network/mcp

Need this verified for your stack — or a route we don't have yet?

We author + individually verify a route for your exact task within 24h. Custom route — $25 · Teams: Pilot — $750/mo · all plans